Bond strength of conventional versus modified methods for Class IV restorations in primary incisors: An in vitro study

Background. Aesthetic restorations of severely decayed anterior primary teeth are challenging due to the small size of the teeth and the large pulp chambers. Therefore, this study evaluated and compared the tensile and shear bond strengths of conventional versus modified methods (slot technique) of Cl IV restorations in primary incisors.

Methods. A total of 120 extracted intact maxillary primary central and lateral incisors were divided into two groups. In group A, conventional Cl IV cavities were prepared. In group B, after conventional cavity preparation, four and three incisal slots were prepared on the incisal edges of the central and lateral incisors, respectively. All the teeth were restored using composite resin, and then the tensile and shear bond strengths were evaluated.

Results. A statistically significant increase in the tensile bond strength of restorations was recorded in the modified technique compared to the conventional method (P=0.001). Although an increase in the shear bond strengths was found in the modified method, the value did not reach a statistically significant level (P=0.158). The most frequent fracture type was adhesive in the conventional group and cohesive in the modified group, considering the tensile and shear bond strength tests. In both groups, the highest average tensile bond strength was recorded in teeth with the cohesive fracture in dentin, and the lowest average was seen in the adhesive type.

Conclusions. Incisal slots could increase the tensile bond strengths of Cl IV composite resin restorations in primary teeth.